Texas A&M
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
256  Cameron Villarreal SR 32:23
290  Christian Farris JR 32:28
306  Elliott Farris SR 32:31
352  Austin Wells SR 32:38
395  Alex Riba JR 32:43
762  Jon Bishop FR 33:24
1,138  Jacob Perry SO 33:56
1,150  Ryan Teel SR 33:57
1,221  Juan Uribe SO 34:02
1,234  Colin Stoeber SR 34:03
1,789  Taylor Clayton SO 34:48
National Rank #55 of 312
South Central Region Rank #3 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 43.0%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.4%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 99.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cameron Villarreal Christian Farris Elliott Farris Austin Wells Alex Riba Jon Bishop Jacob Perry Ryan Teel Juan Uribe Colin Stoeber Taylor Clayton
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 836 32:35 32:38 32:21 32:16 33:43 32:37 34:27 34:25 33:40 34:03
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 751 31:48 32:28 31:49 32:51 33:49 33:01 33:46
Aggieland Open 10/07 1260 33:57
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational (B Race) 10/14 34:00 34:02 35:12
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 874 32:18 32:53 31:59 32:45 33:28 34:57 34:39
SEC Championship 10/28 991 32:52 32:09 33:45 33:23 32:59 34:09 34:07 34:30 36:04
South Central Region Championships 11/11 988 33:25 32:18 32:39 33:14 33:06 34:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 43.0% 29.9 772 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.3 8.3 24.9
Region Championship 100% 2.6 104 43.0 53.3 3.1 0.6 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cameron Villarreal 54.8% 167.3
Christian Farris 49.8% 177.4
Elliott Farris 46.7% 182.5
Austin Wells 44.3% 197.6
Alex Riba 43.2% 206.4
Jon Bishop 43.9% 242.1
Jacob Perry 46.1% 249.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cameron Villarreal 13.3 0.3 0.1 1.1 2.4 5.7 6.7 8.5 8.5 7.9 6.8 6.3 5.4 4.6 4.0 3.2 3.6 2.3 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.2 1.3
Christian Farris 15.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.1 2.6 4.2 5.8 7.2 8.0 7.2 5.0 6.2 6.3 5.0 4.5 4.8 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.5 1.4 2.1
Elliott Farris 17.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 3.3 5.3 5.2 5.7 6.4 6.7 5.2 5.0 4.6 5.4 3.7 4.4 3.9 3.0 3.2 2.0 2.7
Austin Wells 20.3 0.1 0.6 1.1 1.6 2.6 3.6 4.9 4.0 4.7 5.8 6.0 4.4 5.2 4.5 4.3 4.9 3.0 2.8 3.0
Alex Riba 23.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.6 2.7 3.9 3.9 4.3 6.3 4.4 4.9 4.0 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.3 3.4
Jon Bishop 49.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Jacob Perry 74.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 43.0% 100.0% 43.0 43.0 2
3 53.3% 53.3 3
4 3.1% 3.1 4
5 0.6% 0.6 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 43.0% 43.0 57.1 43.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida State 14.8% 1.0 0.1
Kentucky 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Alabama 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Lamar 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0